Ah yes! This question comes up more often than you’d think. Intel Atom vs Celeron is one common question that budget oriented buyers ask.
Intel has been on top of the processor game for a long time. Almost every computer gets out of the factory with an Intel processor operating inside of it. AMD is also out there running strong, but Intel still beats in the market share.
Intel is setting a standard when it comes to processing power, and they prove that you don’t need that many cores to offer reliable performance. An i5 or i7 processor of a newer generation is all you need when it comes to processors if you want to undertake heavy tasks such as gaming, video rendering or graphic design.
Although the Intel Core series has become synonymous with high-performance machines, we often hear about Intel Atom and Celeron when searching for budget laptops.
Intel Atom and Intel Celeron are often compared for their performance. However, comparing Intel Atom vs Celeron isn’t entirely fair. These processors were not manufactured with the same purpose.
Their target devices are different, and their structure is different. Both of the processors come with their advantages and disadvantages. Some CPUs operate at higher clock speeds resulting in a better performance, and other operate at lower speeds, but they offer low power consumption.
For some devices battery life is important, for others not too much. Both processors seek to solve entirely different issues. . This article will be all about their structure, performance and devices they were intended for.
Intel Atom is a type of Intel’s processor. It belongs to the family of x86 and x86-64 processors. Atom processors are mostly intended for use in compact and small devices such as smartphones, tablets, and mobile Internet devices. The processors itself has evolved, and nowadays, most netbooks available on the market are shipped with an Intel Atoms processor inside.
Atom product family has several distinct characteristics which separate it from other processors made by the same manufacturer.
They have a significantly lower price than their competition. Additionally, their power requirements and consumption are kept low which makes them ideal for pocket devices.
An Intel Atom processor is not only the cheapest Intel processor, but it also consumes the least power. Since they are solely found on mobile devices, their clock speed is kept at a minimum. Currently, it can range from 1.44 GHz to 1.6 GHz for a typical Atom Processor.
Intel Atom processors are intentionally made to be less powerful because they are optimized for different devices. The preferred operations for a device operating with an Atom processor are Web browsing email, operating with certain documents, etc.
Intel’s main intent for this family of processors was to integrate them into the common smartphone. The mobile industry is taking over the market, and Intel wanted to have its cut. However, software compatibility is their biggest issue, and smartphone manufacturers often overlook Intel and turn to other mobile processor manufacturers such as Qualcomm.
Some of the latest Intel Atom processors are as follows:
For Mobile Devices
- Intel® Atom™ x5-Z8300 Processor
- Intel® Atom™ x7-Z8700 Processor
- Intel® Atom™ x5-Z8500 Processor
Intel Celeron is also a microprocessor made by Intel. It belongs to a family of processors based on Intel Processor
Intel Celeron was designed to be the lower end model of the Pentium processor. Therefore, it is designed for budget oriented customers and for running low-end applications and software.
Most of the latest Celeron processors are dual core processors. Their processing speed can range for 1.1 GHz to 3 GHz. The lower clock speed processors are generally found on mobile devices. The 3 GHz processor would be found on the desktop.
Their power consumption can range from 6W to 51W depending on the performance and clock speed. Therefore, in terms of performance, they are significantly better than Intel Atom processors, but they are also much more expensive.
Some of the latest and famous Intel Celeron Processors include the following:
For Mobile Devices:
- Intel® Celeron® Processor 3865U
- Intel® Celeron® Processor 3965U
- Intel® Celeron® Processor N3350
For Desktop Computers
- Intel® Celeron® Processor G3930
- Intel® Celeron® Processor G3930T
- Intel® Celeron® Processor G3950
Intel Atom vs Celeron – The Gist
Finally, let’s summarize everything that was mentioned about these two types of processors.
Intel Celeron was designed with a purpose to bear a lower price than other Intel processors at that time. It was primarily designed for laptops and desktops and therefore is capable of a somewhat decent level of work.
The low price reflects in the lower performance than other Intel processors but it is perfect for those who do word processing, internet surfing, and other low-key tasks. Intel Celeron’s target audience is people with low demands and expectations who want to spend the least money possible on their computer.
On the other hand, Intel Atom was designed with a completely different purpose. It was intended for use in netbooks, mobile Internet devices, tablets, smartphones, etc. Essentially, it targets all devices with low power consumption.
Which One is Faster?
In this Intel Atom vs Celeron, it all boils to this question. Which is one is faster, or rather, better in performance?
So, now we know that their target devices are completely different. This also contributes to the fact that their structure and performance are also different.
Both of them were fighting for dominance on the market a couple of years when Celeron was trying hard to be a part of budget desktop computers, and Atom wanted to be implemented in portable devices.
Although Celeron did win the battle and has currently become synonymous with budget-oriented machines, Atom lost its opportunity in the mobile device market.
However, in terms of performance, both Atom and Celeron processors aren’t a huge success. Atom was never widely accepted as the right option for smartphone developers, and Celeron was often overlooked for its poor performance, even though it offered a very low price.
With the current market trends and the prices of the laptops getting cheaper, Celeron will either phase out or improve its performance by a good multiple.
Therefore, in terms of sheer performance, Celeron certainly performs better and faster because it was meant to operate desktop computers and laptops. Atom, on the other hand, has low power consumption, offering it to perform better with portable devices.
The difference is pretty clear, but there is one similarity they share: they are both hold Intel’s trademark quality.